Jennifer Snowden v. Ethicon

VERDICT

Trial
11/30/22 – 12/22/22

Summary

In this trial, Jennifer Snowden received pelvic mesh implants from a treating doctor for her incontinence during a hysterectomy surgery. This mesh was manufactured by Johnson & Johnson and implanted by Dr. Charmaine Oladell. Snowden sues both parties, contending that the mesh left her with chronic pain and nerve damage.

Snowden claims that Johnson & Johnson was aware of the danger of the implant shrinking, but did not properly warn the public, as it did not want to lose a profitable product. Representatives for Snowden also claim that Dr. Oladell may have also been aware of the mesh's danger, yet continued with the procedure.

Representatives for Johnson & Johnson claim that Snowden's pain stems from the same underlying cause of her hysterectomy and is not related to the mesh. They highlight the safety testing performed on the mesh implant, as well as emphasizing that Dr. Oladell properly followed the standard of care.

Dr. Oladell’s attorneys assert that Dr. Oladell acted within the standard of care and that any pain Snowden suffers is due to the mesh product, not Dr. Oladell's treatment.

Outcome

Verdict for defendant.

Sessions

DEC
7
PM Session
Defense Witness(es)
2 Chapters
DEC
12
PM Session
Defense Witness(es)
2 Chapters
DEC
14
DEC
20

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us