LaPlante v. Martinez

VERDICT

Trial
04/24/25 – 05/20/25

Summary

In this motorcycle crash case, motorcyclist Michael LaPlante was struck by a construction worker driving to a job site. This accident led to LaPlante suffering a leg amputation and requiring a prosthetic leg. LaPlante sues both construction worker Antelmo Martinez and employer Griffith Construction, claiming that Martinez was acting as an employee of Griffith during his commute.

Brian Panish, representing Michael LaPlante, asserts that while Martinez was not on the clock, he was still acting within the scope of his job as he commuted to the site. Panish highlights how Griffith benefited from having Martinez's truck available and how Martinez's long commute left him fatigued and more likely to cause an accident. Additionally, Panish presents testimony of LaPlante's recovery process, enduring 18 surgeries in the wake of the crash.

While Martinez accepts liability for the accident, he disputes that he was acting as a Griffith employee at the time of the crash, as he was not clocked in during his commute. Attorneys for the defendants also highlight LaPlante's recovery, as he received a prosthetic leg and can still drive and work.

Outcome

Verdict for plaintiff.

Total damages: $27,727,630.

Sessions

APR
28
APR
30
MAY
15
AM Session
Other
2 Chapters
MAY
20

Recording Disclaimer: This proceeding was recorded in full.

AudioCaseFiles

Exclusive audio opinions to enhance your law school experience

AudioCaseFiles

Essentials

The most important and informative moments of each trial

Essentials

Training Libraries

Trial Advocacy, Rules of Evidence and Appellate Advocacy

Training

  • Follow Us